Вземи премиум и отключи всички добавки
Публикации.: 16   Посещава се от: 80 users
16.07.2015 - 08:26
(deleted)
Профилът е изтрит.
Well,we all know that HW is the weakest and most expensive strategy in this game.
Strategy boosts inf def,tank attack and marines cost is lower.
But nerfing inf attack,tank deff by -3(3v3 part)
submarine attack and deff by -2
bombers and stealth attack and deffence by -2,
annd at the end nerfing marines by -2 for attack and deff.
This strategy is weaker than GW that is plus on that boosting range of marines.
Only way that gw is weaker is deff of inf -2 and attack of tanks -2(i dont calculate attack of inf and deff of tanks cuz its -3 with HW)
If this is one more stealth strategy,we must fully revamp it.
All suggestians and your wieving of this strat post here.
I will add all suggestions at the poll that i will make when there will be enough suggestions about revamping this strategy.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
16.07.2015 - 08:40
Support, better then just nerfing everything else but PD
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
16.07.2015 - 08:50
I think everyone agrees HW warfare needs a boost. I really like the idea of it but the nerfs are too drastic. I think removing the sub attack and defense nerf as a whole, and removing the -1 attack to marines should prove best. To balance it though the -80 on marines could be just -60.
----
We are not the same - I am a Martian.
We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?


Зареждане......
Зареждане......
16.07.2015 - 09:07
(deleted)
Профилът е изтрит.
Написано от The Tactician, 16.07.2015 at 08:50

I think everyone agrees HW warfare needs a boost. I really like the idea of it but the nerfs are too drastic. I think removing the sub attack and defense nerf as a whole, and removing the -1 attack to marines should prove best. To balance it though the -80 on marines could be just -60.

I told about gw that has same idea as hw,but marines of gw arent nerfed and same cost like hw....l
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
16.07.2015 - 09:16
Hw is a mix between gw and the old gc, so its natural to be a little bit weaker than both to meet in the middle. I believe a strat with tanks and infantry stronger than normal but weaker than gc and marines/militia stronger than normal but weaker than gw would be a nice balance. I think my proposal will balance it out.
----
We are not the same - I am a Martian.
We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?


Зареждане......
Зареждане......
16.07.2015 - 09:26
(deleted)
Профилът е изтрит.
Написано от The Tactician, 16.07.2015 at 09:16

Hw is a mix between gw and the old gc, so its natural to be a little bit weaker than both to meet in the middle. I believe a strat with tanks and infantry stronger than normal but weaker than gc and marines/militia stronger than normal but weaker than gw would be a nice balance. I think my proposal will balance it out.

ok
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
16.07.2015 - 11:40
I am not seeing the proposal here
HW isn't bad its just hard to play strategy. We can try giving it cost boosts like -10 cost for tanks. Otherwise I think its fine as it is. I could also suggest +1 range for militia but that would make it one OP strat so I won't. I do wish people tried it a lot more though.
----
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
16.07.2015 - 11:56
No lb is the weakest...
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
16.07.2015 - 13:36
(deleted)
Профилът е изтрит.
Написано от Xenosapien, 16.07.2015 at 11:56

No lb is the weakest...

lb is stronger than no strategy,hw isnt.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
18.07.2015 - 08:56
I agree with minus, HW is just hard to play, not in-viable though. If you have room to expand, it is definitely doable. I guess if u want to change it give inf 2 attack so their not totally just defending and walk breaking.. But that's not that big of a deal. I honestly think it's fine as is
----


Зареждане......
Зареждане......
18.07.2015 - 10:20
HW is not fine as it is. any strat has better units than HW.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
18.07.2015 - 18:07
HW should be a weaker version of GC and GW, but also cost cheaper. So, I would support a -10 on marine cost and see how it goes from there
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
19.07.2015 - 06:59
(deleted)
Профилът е изтрит.
Написано от Cthulhu, 18.07.2015 at 18:07

HW should be a weaker version of GC and GW, but also cost cheaper. So, I would support a -10 on marine cost and see how it goes from there

Agree,but can you tell me full thinking,about inf and tanks that are nerfed,and stealths attack and def.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
19.07.2015 - 07:06
Написано от Kromn, 19.07.2015 at 06:59

Написано от Cthulhu, 18.07.2015 at 18:07

HW should be a weaker version of GC and GW, but also cost cheaper. So, I would support a -10 on marine cost and see how it goes from there

Agree,but can you tell me full thinking,about inf and tanks that are nerfed,and stealths attack and def.


You can win 2 ways that i see it, by quality or by quantity. I believe HW should be more focused on quantity then quality. It doesn't need the best stealth, it just needs a lot
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
19.07.2015 - 07:29
(deleted)
Профилът е изтрит.
This is my opinion:
Id like fully revamping it.
That can be mix between SM and GC.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
19.07.2015 - 07:33
(deleted)
Профилът е изтрит.
Написано от Cthulhu, 19.07.2015 at 07:06



Well,marines attack 2 with hw.1 tank can kill 4 hw marines........
20 tanks can kill 80.....
Is it rly good to stay like this.......
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
atWar

About Us
Contact

Поверителност | Правила на играта | Знамена | Partners

Copyright © 2025 atWar. All rights reserved.

Присъединете се към нас.

Разпространете новината.