Вземи премиум и отключи всички добавки
Публикации.: 13   Посещава се от: 46 users
17.12.2013 - 19:55
 KYBL
I am working on a 1400s scenario and now making Australia. Compared to the rest of the world, 1400's Australia was full of cavemen and backwards aboriginals. Because of this, they do not get the regular infantry, cavalry, etc. that other places get. However, I am planning to add over 100 tiny tribes within Australia and it is extremely annoying to try and group every single one into numerous different "excluded" lists for each individual unit. Instead, it would be much easier if we could group the entire region together and add it in to units excluded/included as a region. This would make things much faster and easier for map makers.
----

Зареждане......
Зареждане......
17.12.2013 - 20:22
 Utah
FINALLY SOMEONE ELSE UNDERSTANDS.

SUPPORT!!!!1
----
The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
17.12.2013 - 21:09
Or you could use the "only avariable in X country"
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
18.12.2013 - 07:03
 Utah
Написано от Tundy, 17.12.2013 at 21:09

Or you could use the "only avariable in X country"


That would fix it for him but not for everyone else.
----
The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
18.12.2013 - 07:05
Написано от Utah, 18.12.2013 at 07:03

Написано от Tundy, 17.12.2013 at 21:09

Or you could use the "only avariable in X country"


That would fix it for him but not for everyone else.


Написано от KYBL, 17.12.2013 at 19:55

..However, I am planning to add over 100 tiny tribes within Australia and it is extremely annoying to try and group every single one into numerous different "excluded" lists for each individual unit..


I wouldn't want to click exclude for every country 100 times..
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
18.12.2013 - 07:17
Death1812
Профилът е изтрит.
Написано от Utah, 17.12.2013 at 20:22

FINALLY SOMEONE ELSE UNDERSTANDS.

SUPPORT!!!!1
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
18.12.2013 - 07:34
Support
----
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
18.12.2013 - 08:18
 KYBL
Написано от Tundy, 17.12.2013 at 21:09

Or you could use the "only avariable in X country"

The problem is it would still take a shit ton of time.
----

Зареждане......
Зареждане......
18.12.2013 - 12:15
I approve of this.
----
Написано от Mahdi, 23.11.2013 at 20:30

I don't consider the phrase "massive fag" to be an insult. Mods did.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
10.02.2014 - 18:19
 Utah
For fuck's sake admins, if you will add anything add this! This is making maps way too tedious to make.
----
The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
10.02.2014 - 18:22
Support.
----
[img]http://i.imgur.com/4TrCT5Z.png?1[/img]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/JpNbfAX.png[/img]
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
10.02.2014 - 18:27
Yes, I agree with this. It'd also be nice if we could just assign specific units directly to a scenario side/player rather than to their home countries.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
10.02.2014 - 19:55
Написано от FoxxyR, 10.02.2014 at 18:27

Yes, I agree with this. It'd also be nice if we could just assign specific units directly to a scenario side/player rather than to their home countries.

Support
----
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
atWar

About Us
Contact

Поверителност | Правила на играта | Знамена | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

Присъединете се към нас.

Разпространете новината.