Ouch Публикации.: 72 от: USA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3c82/b3c829d4484f971f7d2a7a75bb618aa3b16adaca" alt="" |
It is a good idea to the fact that submarines dont have a great capacity currently anyways...
----
-Man on a Mission
AkA berserk
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
|
Homero Публикации.: 78 от: Полша
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63a57/63a5759ffdd92d9df42cc86becf2cec70d34a68e" alt="" |
I would leave subs capacity where it is. They can transport 4 with MoS which I feel it's all right already.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
|
Homero Публикации.: 78 от: Полша
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63a57/63a5759ffdd92d9df42cc86becf2cec70d34a68e" alt="" |
Well maybe because AT primary role is to transport. Subs main role is surprise attack (in theory). Transport option is somehow a bonus like for helicopters in DS, and I know that in practice subs are just stealth transports rarely used for attacks but that doesn't mean they should be underwater transport for 4-5 units with 7 or 9 attack and stealth. If we go with capacity II why not make them benefit from Safer Transportation's +3 HP?
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
|
|
Its ok how it is 5 is just no needed
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
|