Вземи премиум и отключи всички добавки
Публикации.: 44   Посещава се от: 102 users

Оригиналната публикация

Публикувано от Utah, 10.05.2013 - 07:30
Sorry if this has been asked before but I searched and found nothing. So in my colonial scenario all the major powers always ally and it's really annoying. So can we have preset alliances that can't be broken until I allow it in events or something. So maybe I'll make 13 colonies an ally of Great Britain until turn x then they can end their alliance if they want.
27.07.2014 - 01:18
More support! Advanced atWar diplomacy pls!
----
"Another such victory and I come back to Epirus alone" - Pyrrhus of Epirus
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
27.07.2014 - 08:41
YES! a BIG YES FROM ME
----
Everyone is living a myth and it's important to know what yours is. It could be a tragedy- and maybe you don't want it to be.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
27.07.2014 - 12:18
Why can't you just make it a team game and have everybody who is suppose to be allies with each be on the same team? I get that you can't break the alliance afterwards but then again breaking alliances might not be a good idea since the host can rage and ban you now.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
27.07.2014 - 21:41
Написано от Fockmeeard, 27.07.2014 at 12:18

Why can't you just make it a team game and have everybody who is suppose to be allies with each be on the same team? I get that you can't break the alliance afterwards but then again breaking alliances might not be a good idea since the host can rage and ban you now.


True but this opens up a-lot of possibilities like having Russia and Japan remain at peace in a WW2 game till a certain turn.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
02.08.2014 - 01:11
Написано от Pyrrhus, 27.07.2014 at 01:18

Advanced atWar diplomacy pls!


Yes please, somethimes its really confusing as some teams in history fought eachother but then Fought with Eachother and bla and Teamswitch and all that jazz.

Total Support
----


Зареждане......
Зареждане......
03.08.2014 - 03:03
Absolute Support.
----
Alejandro (/Shadownano/Romano/) Madrid
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
04.08.2014 - 16:26
This has been suggested many many times before, even I had a post on it. Support!
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
04.08.2014 - 22:26
Could we also not have everyone start out at war in scenario/non scenario? Unless it's something like Nazi Germany and Russia, I don't think Canada and Great Britain should be at war~
----
Capitalism, Ho!
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
05.08.2014 - 05:27
:Thumbup: YAAAAAY
----


Зареждане......
Зареждане......
05.08.2014 - 21:02
Написано от Meester, 27.07.2014 at 21:41

Написано от Fockmeeard, 27.07.2014 at 12:18

Why can't you just make it a team game and have everybody who is suppose to be allies with each be on the same team? I get that you can't break the alliance afterwards but then again breaking alliances might not be a good idea since the host can rage and ban you now.


True but this opens up a-lot of possibilities like having Russia and Japan remain at peace in a WW2 game till a certain turn.

That introduces another problem: what if the players declare war or someone sets up a game that turns out to be boring for the first 10 turns (about an hour) but becomes pivotal later? If we had role-players in a game, we could do that.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
06.08.2014 - 01:44
Написано от Sinjid, 05.08.2014 at 21:02

Написано от Meester, 27.07.2014 at 21:41

Написано от Fockmeeard, 27.07.2014 at 12:18

Why can't you just make it a team game and have everybody who is suppose to be allies with each be on the same team? I get that you can't break the alliance afterwards but then again breaking alliances might not be a good idea since the host can rage and ban you now.


True but this opens up a-lot of possibilities like having Russia and Japan remain at peace in a WW2 game till a certain turn.

That introduces another problem: what if the players declare war or someone sets up a game that turns out to be boring for the first 10 turns (about an hour) but becomes pivotal later? If we had role-players in a game, we could do that.


Well you can set the truce to be breakable after a certain turn.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
06.08.2014 - 20:20
Написано от Meester, 06.08.2014 at 01:44

Написано от Sinjid, 05.08.2014 at 21:02

Написано от Meester, 27.07.2014 at 21:41

Написано от Fockmeeard, 27.07.2014 at 12:18

Why can't you just make it a team game and have everybody who is suppose to be allies with each be on the same team? I get that you can't break the alliance afterwards but then again breaking alliances might not be a good idea since the host can rage and ban you now.


True but this opens up a-lot of possibilities like having Russia and Japan remain at peace in a WW2 game till a certain turn.

That introduces another problem: what if the players declare war or someone sets up a game that turns out to be boring for the first 10 turns (about an hour) but becomes pivotal later? If we had role-players in a game, we could do that.


Well you can set the truce to be breakable after a certain turn.

Exactly what I mean. Players could have a very important scenario side but not be able to do anything right away for the first 10 turns, 40-50+ minutes.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
07.08.2014 - 03:51
This is something that NEEDS to happen. 100% support.
----
"All he does is smoke pot, jerk off and play that damn game"
~Michael Townley.
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
09.08.2014 - 02:54
Yayaya ok
----




#FuckHdrakon
Зареждане......
Зареждане......
  • 1
  • 2
atWar

About Us
Contact

Поверителност | Правила на играта | Знамена | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

Присъединете се към нас.

Разпространете новината.