Do you think uk/germ-turk/ukr is unfair?

Turk/ukraine combo and uk/germ combo have their weaknesses and strenghts, just like everything.
Its something refreshing and not a standard gameplay.

this isn't anything for other game strat and tips... dont move

This has been gone over a lot, I even made a thread about it while back here --------> http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=14379

Which pretty much shows the opinions of lots of people/clans ( opinions may change since this is outdated)

no bump pls

Написано от The Tactician, 09.10.2014 at 08:50

This has been gone over a lot, I even made a thread about it while back here --------> http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=14379

Which pretty much shows the opinions of lots of people/clans ( opinions may change since this is outdated)

no bump pls

BLAAAAAAAAAAA I WANT ATTENTION NNNNNNN (jk)

Go ahead im not stopping you <3

Isnt germany + uk the counter of turkey + ukraine?

Написано от Tundy, 09.10.2014 at 08:52

Isnt germany + uk the counter of turkey + ukraine?

No, but mostly west = the counter of turkey + ukr combo

Combo is stupid, period.

Probably the same fag who started the 4 min turns trend.

Написано от Goblin, 09.10.2014 at 11:00

Probably the same fag who started the 4 min turns trend.

True that.

Написано от Plato, 09.10.2014 at 11:14

Написано от Goblin, 09.10.2014 at 11:00

Probably the same fag who started the 4 min turns trend.

True that.

Plato for mod!!!

Написано от Plato, 09.10.2014 at 10:49

I'm really getting pissed from these threads lately.Their will never be a single rule book about Aw,its a freakin stratetgy game,you cant by any chance control how a person acts every single game.Not wfing the cap turn 1,not attacking you opponents capital turn 1 back in afterwind<3 were all common etiquette which all players agreed on,while trying to convince all AW that rewalling for example is bullshit/not bullshit will get no where.Same goes for the picks,now its almost forbiddean to have a Uk-germ let alone turkey-ukraine which in my opinion is utter crap,its seriously overrated.Back in the old days,it was completely normal to get those combos and no one complained(which was alot more fun).Though I dont remeber which fagg started the trend tbh.

Indeed.. in the old days it was awesome to play spain/france vs uk/germany

I dont really care about uk/germany combo, but i feel that turk/ukr combo is just not fun to play as or play against, this has been brought up many times and ive said this every time. While its possible to lose with turkey/ukraine combo, its very unlikely and in a normal situation without any crazy variables, you can expect turk-ukr to win nearly every time, because its just such a power region, its easier to expand faster, and the power of each of the east powers together just makes west v east a bad bet for west.

Написано от Quantum027, 09.10.2014 at 11:49

I dont really care about uk/germany combo, but i feel that turk/ukr combo is just not fun to play as or play against, this has been brought up many times and ive said this every time. While its possible to lose with turkey/ukraine combo, its very unlikely and in a normal situation without any crazy variables, you can expect turk-ukr to win nearly every time, because its just such a power region, its easier to expand faster, and the power of each of the east powers together just makes west v east a bad bet for west.

How many times did you play vs ukr/turk combo and uk/germany combo? Be honest, im not gonna bitch about it. Just want to know

Написано от Plato, 09.10.2014 at 10:49

Back in the old days,it was completely normal to get Ukr-turk combos and no one complained.Though I dont remember which fagg started the trend tbh.

Написано от Goblin, 09.10.2014 at 11:00

Probably the same fag who started the 4 min turns trend.

I found them.Its these fags..

Написано от Khal.eesi, 09.10.2014 at 12:07

Написано от Plato, 09.10.2014 at 10:49

Back in the old days,it was completely normal to get Ukr-turk combos and no one complained.Though I dont remember which fagg started the trend tbh.

Написано от Goblin, 09.10.2014 at 11:00

Probably the same fag who started the 4 min turns trend.

I found them.Its these fags..

nice time waste!

Написано от Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 12:07

Написано от Quantum027, 09.10.2014 at 11:49

I dont really care about uk/germany combo, but i feel that turk/ukr combo is just not fun to play as or play against, this has been brought up many times and ive said this every time. While its possible to lose with turkey/ukraine combo, its very unlikely and in a normal situation without any crazy variables, you can expect turk-ukr to win nearly every time, because its just such a power region, its easier to expand faster, and the power of each of the east powers together just makes west v east a bad bet for west.

How many times did you play vs ukr/turk combo and uk/germany combo? Be honest, im not gonna bitch about it. Just want to know

ive played as turkey/ukr 4 times, won all 4, ive played uk/germmany v turk/ukr 2 times, won once by luck

Написано от Quantum027, 09.10.2014 at 12:16

Написано от Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 12:07

Написано от Quantum027, 09.10.2014 at 11:49

I dont really care about uk/germany combo, but i feel that turk/ukr combo is just not fun to play as or play against, this has been brought up many times and ive said this every time. While its possible to lose with turkey/ukraine combo, its very unlikely and in a normal situation without any crazy variables, you can expect turk-ukr to win nearly every time, because its just such a power region, its easier to expand faster, and the power of each of the east powers together just makes west v east a bad bet for west.

How many times did you play vs ukr/turk combo and uk/germany combo? Be honest, im not gonna bitch about it. Just want to know

ive played as turkey/ukr 4 times, won all 4, ive played uk/germmany v turk/ukr 2 times, won once by luck

Thanks for being honest.
And now I see why U dont like it. I myself have played vs plenty of uk/germany & turk/ukr combo in 3v3's. Ofc I didnt win them all, but I didn't lose them all either, might lost more than winning, but that was mostly because i was rank 6/7 (at the times people didnt really cry about it) now im better than i was at rank 6/7.
But the thing is, alot of you people fear playing vs ukr/turkey/ uk/germany with the thoughts in your head you have an disadvantage. But its really not an disadvantage. Try to play it more, believe me you would find it more interesting than boring 3v3 standards

I find turks and ukraine combo stronger. Because if turk PD and ukraine sky mennce. you will have a strong defence as well as manuervering ability and strong attack

Написано от Htin, 16.10.2014 at 22:27

I find turks and ukraine combo stronger. Because if turk PD and ukraine sky mennce. you will have a strong defence as well as manuervering ability and strong attack

Well, As for turkey PD and Ukraine SM (both verry expensive strats) will need fundings, and since mostly their third player is or uk/france/germany, they dont have that much money in the beginning, and probably need all the money they have to deffend vs 3 people. So basically ukr/turkey are way to much overrated, IMP ukraine and IMP turkey could possibly work.

Написано от Plato, 09.10.2014 at 10:49

now its almost forbiddean to have a Uk-germ let alone turkey-ukraine which in my opinion is utter crap,its seriously overrated.Back in the old days,it was completely normal to get those combos and no one complained(which was alot more fun).Though I dont remeber which fagg started the trend tbh.

This.

Написано от Waffel, 17.10.2014 at 03:57

Написано от Htin, 16.10.2014 at 22:27

I find turks and ukraine combo stronger. Because if turk PD and ukraine sky mennce. you will have a strong defence as well as manuervering ability and strong attack

Well, As for turkey PD and Ukraine SM (both verry expensive strats) will need fundings, and since mostly their third player is or uk/france/germany, they dont have that much money in the beginning, and probably need all the money they have to deffend vs 3 people. So basically ukr/turkey are way to much overrated, IMP ukraine and IMP turkey could possibly work.

Clans should really stop spreading these ideas to their low ranks.I mean clans should be more open to the idea of diffrent types of country combo's in CW's and stop applying the idea of "fair ranks" too,i mean these stuff have really harmed the AW community.

Написано от Plato, 17.10.2014 at 08:51

Написано от Waffel, 17.10.2014 at 03:57

Написано от Htin, 16.10.2014 at 22:27

I find turks and ukraine combo stronger. Because if turk PD and ukraine sky mennce. you will have a strong defence as well as manuervering ability and strong attack

Well, As for turkey PD and Ukraine SM (both verry expensive strats) will need fundings, and since mostly their third player is or uk/france/germany, they dont have that much money in the beginning, and probably need all the money they have to deffend vs 3 people. So basically ukr/turkey are way to much overrated, IMP ukraine and IMP turkey could possibly work.

Clans should really stop spreading these ideas to their low ranks.I mean clans should be more open to the idea of diffrent types of country combo's in CW's and stop applying the idea of "fair ranks" too,i mean these stuff have really harmed the AW community.

Thank you.

I also think we need to actually play these kind of picks more. It was more fun and a bigger challenge

Написано от Plato, 09.10.2014 at 10:49

Same goes for the picks,now its almost forbiddean to have a Uk-germ let alone turkey-ukraine which in my opinion is utter crap,its seriously overrated.Back in the old days,it was completely normal to get those combos and no one complained(which was alot more fun).Though I dont remeber which fagg started the trend tbh.

pick them if you want, nobody is stopping you. I've never seen any of you guys give the other team the ukr/turk combo in my year on aw, yet here you are criticising all of us. I will worship the clan that beats me and acqui in the ukr/turk as gods. the only country combo i can think of that might stand a chance is uk/italy/volga. maybe rnw. but its so difficult and would require significant luck. poor volga has less starting reins and far less expansion choice than ukr. Italy has half the starting unit count of turk. It would have to be imp. I would agree with waffel that pd is too risky, if your west ally gets hammered therell be no money for turk.

Uk/germ is good, it means a rich east ally and lots of unit prod. but its much more beatable.

Whats wrong with 4 mins...

Написано от Permamuted, 17.10.2014 at 11:14

Написано от Plato, 09.10.2014 at 10:49

Same goes for the picks,now its almost forbiddean to have a Uk-germ let alone turkey-ukraine which in my opinion is utter crap,its seriously overrated.Back in the old days,it was completely normal to get those combos and no one complained(which was alot more fun).Though I dont remeber which fagg started the trend tbh.

pick them if you want, nobody is stopping you. I've never seen any of you guys give the other team the ukr/turk combo in my year on aw, yet here you are criticising all of us. I will worship the clan that beats me and acqui in the ukr/turk as gods. the only country combo i can think of that might stand a chance is uk/italy/volga. maybe rnw. but its so difficult and would require significant luck. poor volga has less starting reins and far less expansion choice than ukr. Italy has half the starting unit count of turk. It would have to be imp. I would agree with waffel that pd is too risky, if your west ally gets hammered therell be no money for turk.

Uk/germ is good, it means a rich east ally and lots of unit prod. but its much more beatable.

Who said i was criticising anyone?I'm criticising the clans actions as a whole.I'm speaking for myself so I advice you to do that aswell.I'm inactive for the last couple of months,but you've been here for a year and i've been here for 3.Their use to be alot of CW's like that,but now when clans pick those combo's i remember that most of the players (including my clanmates) leave the CW,so i do aswell but everyone knows that im ok with it since forever,so i suggest you cut the intelligent assumptions later on.

Написано от Plato, 17.10.2014 at 12:16

Написано от Permamuted, 17.10.2014 at 11:14

Написано от Plato, 09.10.2014 at 10:49

Same goes for the picks,now its almost forbiddean to have a Uk-germ let alone turkey-ukraine which in my opinion is utter crap,its seriously overrated.Back in the old days,it was completely normal to get those combos and no one complained(which was alot more fun).Though I dont remeber which fagg started the trend tbh.

pick them if you want, nobody is stopping you. I've never seen any of you guys give the other team the ukr/turk combo in my year on aw, yet here you are criticising all of us. I will worship the clan that beats me and acqui in the ukr/turk as gods. the only country combo i can think of that might stand a chance is uk/italy/volga. maybe rnw. but its so difficult and would require significant luck. poor volga has less starting reins and far less expansion choice than ukr. Italy has half the starting unit count of turk. It would have to be imp. I would agree with waffel that pd is too risky, if your west ally gets hammered therell be no money for turk.

Uk/germ is good, it means a rich east ally and lots of unit prod. but its much more beatable.

Who said i was criticising anyone?I'm criticising the clans actions as a whole.I'm speaking for myself so I advice you to do that aswell.I'm inactive for the last couple of months,but you've been here for a year and i've been here for 3.Their use to be alot of CW's like that,but now when clans pick those combo's i remember that most of the players (including my clanmates) leave the CW,so i do aswell but everyone knows that im ok with it since forever,so i suggest you cut the intelligent assumptions later on.

Написано от Permamuted, 17.10.2014 at 12:25

Написано от Plato, 17.10.2014 at 12:16

Написано от Permamuted, 17.10.2014 at 11:14

Написано от Plato, 09.10.2014 at 10:49

Same goes for the picks,now its almost forbiddean to have a Uk-germ let alone turkey-ukraine which in my opinion is utter crap,its seriously overrated.Back in the old days,it was completely normal to get those combos and no one complained(which was alot more fun).Though I dont remeber which fagg started the trend tbh.

pick them if you want, nobody is stopping you. I've never seen any of you guys give the other team the ukr/turk combo in my year on aw, yet here you are criticising all of us. I will worship the clan that beats me and acqui in the ukr/turk as gods. the only country combo i can think of that might stand a chance is uk/italy/volga. maybe rnw. but its so difficult and would require significant luck. poor volga has less starting reins and far less expansion choice than ukr. Italy has half the starting unit count of turk. It would have to be imp. I would agree with waffel that pd is too risky, if your west ally gets hammered therell be no money for turk.

Uk/germ is good, it means a rich east ally and lots of unit prod. but its much more beatable.

Who said i was criticising anyone?I'm criticising the clans actions as a whole.I'm speaking for myself so I advice you to do that aswell.I'm inactive for the last couple of months,but you've been here for a year and i've been here for 3.Their use to be alot of CW's like that,but now when clans pick those combo's i remember that most of the players (including my clanmates) leave the CW,so i do aswell but everyone knows that im ok with it since forever,so i suggest you cut the intelligent assumptions later on.

omygod I laughed so hard about that xD

From what i remember i played once a cw vs ukraine turkey combo.. I was low ranked and so were all the other 5 guys but we won and it wasnt very hard

Uk germ Volga combo smashes ukr Turk combo

Написано от Mr_Own_U, 17.10.2014 at 17:02

Uk germ Volga combo smashes ukr Turk combo

Mr_Own_U's theory is correct.

Mr_Own_U is right.