California versus Texas

If both states declared war on each other, who would win?
Assume the rest of the USA are neutral and cannot be captured. Troops can travel through other states though.

I believe Texas would be destroyed
Who do you think would win and why?

Texas has guns liberfornians have dildos....

If you mean in a atwar type scenario probably cali from income and population.

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:25

Texas has guns liberfornians have dildos....

If you mean in a atwar type scenario probably cali from income and population.

I mean in real life. Also Bob from Texas with his 32 long rifle won't stand a chance versus assault troopers.

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:26

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:25

Texas has guns liberfornians have dildos....

If you mean in a atwar type scenario probably cali from income and population.

I mean in real life. Also Bob from Texas with his 32 long rifle won't stand a chance versus assault troopers.

What makes you think California has assault troopers xD they're to busy with the liberal arts degrees to give a shit about fighting. Texas on the other hand has large communities of people who sit around all day blasting shit.

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:28

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:26

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:25

Texas has guns liberfornians have dildos....

If you mean in a atwar type scenario probably cali from income and population.

I mean in real life. Also Bob from Texas with his 32 long rifle won't stand a chance versus assault troopers.

What makes you think California has assault troopers xD they're to busy with the liberal arts degrees to give a shit about fighting. Texas on the other hand has large communities of people who sit around all day blasting shit.

California has the largest number of veterans, the highest population, naval domination.
Texas would be owned.

Stop arguing with stereotype and get real.

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:29

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:28

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:26

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:25

Texas has guns liberfornians have dildos....

If you mean in a atwar type scenario probably cali from income and population.

I mean in real life. Also Bob from Texas with his 32 long rifle won't stand a chance versus assault troopers.

What makes you think California has assault troopers xD they're to busy with the liberal arts degrees to give a shit about fighting. Texas on the other hand has large communities of people who sit around all day blasting shit.

California has the largest number of veterans, the highest population, naval domination.
Texas would be owned.

Stop arguing with stereotype and get real.

Links? Because our navy is in Hawaii the veterans like to stay away from liberal gun grabbers (tend to live in the south and midwest) and population woukd only matter if they strapped a bomb to everyone's chest and rushed Dallas xD

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:28

What makes you think California has assault troopers xD they're to busy with the liberal arts degrees to give a shit about fighting. Texas on the other hand has large communities of people who sit around all day blasting shit.

Not everyone who lives in California turns incapable to fight.
-------------

Personally i think it's a stupid scenario since all the advanced and relevant techlonogy owned by american government and not to specific region, and if USA stays out of it so they will have to start everything from zero.

If we are being practical - Texas owns the important resources like oil while California owns world's most succesful high-techlonogy companies. if we look forward hypothetical scenarios i think that's the way of thinking we should choose.

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:32

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:29

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:28

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:26

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:25

Texas has guns liberfornians have dildos....

If you mean in a atwar type scenario probably cali from income and population.

I mean in real life. Also Bob from Texas with his 32 long rifle won't stand a chance versus assault troopers.

What makes you think California has assault troopers xD they're to busy with the liberal arts degrees to give a shit about fighting. Texas on the other hand has large communities of people who sit around all day blasting shit.

California has the largest number of veterans, the highest population, naval domination.
Texas would be owned.

Stop arguing with stereotype and get real.

Links? Because our navy is in Hawaii the veterans like to stay away from liberal gun grabbers (tend to live in the south and midwest) and population woukd only matter if they strapped a bomb to everyone's chest and rushed Dallas xD

I hope you realize that guns are legal in California because there is this thing called the Constitution still.
California also has a massive military police at their disposal.

As for the veteran statistics,




As for ships, California has Texas owned.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_ships_of_the_United_States_Navy

I'v readed something about this from a guy who's living in California - Police and civil guard organistations have very solid firepower abilities that resmbles armies infnatry.

Написано от Rock Lee, 26.03.2017 at 23:37

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:28

What makes you think California has assault troopers xD they're to busy with the liberal arts degrees to give a shit about fighting. Texas on the other hand has large communities of people who sit around all day blasting shit.

Not everyone who lives in California turns incapable to fight.
-------------

Personally i think it's a stupid scenario since all the advanced and relevant techlonogy owned by american government and not to specific region, and if USA stays out of it so they will have to start everything from zero.

If we are being practical - Texas owns the important resources like oil while California owns world's most succesful high-techlonogy companies. if we look forward hypothetical scenarios i think that's the way of thinking we should choose.

You are correct, but I never said everyone, I only ment to imply the culture in Texas breeds people more inclined to a combat situation then in california.

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:38

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:32

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:29

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:28

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:26

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:25

Texas has guns liberfornians have dildos....

If you mean in a atwar type scenario probably cali from income and population.

I mean in real life. Also Bob from Texas with his 32 long rifle won't stand a chance versus assault troopers.

What makes you think California has assault troopers xD they're to busy with the liberal arts degrees to give a shit about fighting. Texas on the other hand has large communities of people who sit around all day blasting shit.

California has the largest number of veterans, the highest population, naval domination.
Texas would be owned.

Stop arguing with stereotype and get real.

Links? Because our navy is in Hawaii the veterans like to stay away from liberal gun grabbers (tend to live in the south and midwest) and population woukd only matter if they strapped a bomb to everyone's chest and rushed Dallas xD

I hope you realize that guns are legal in California because there is this thing called the Constitution still.
California also has a massive military police at their disposal.

As for the veteran statistics,




As for ships, California has Texas owned.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_ships_of_the_United_States_Navy

I'm standing by my argument, the average Californian is useless garbage. I'll take my chances with texas. As for gun bans, your correct they are legal as long as they hold 10 bullets, which no gun you would need in a war scenario has.

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:41

Написано от Rock Lee, 26.03.2017 at 23:37

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:28

What makes you think California has assault troopers xD they're to busy with the liberal arts degrees to give a shit about fighting. Texas on the other hand has large communities of people who sit around all day blasting shit.

Not everyone who lives in California turns incapable to fight.
-------------

Personally i think it's a stupid scenario since all the advanced and relevant techlonogy owned by american government and not to specific region, and if USA stays out of it so they will have to start everything from zero.

If we are being practical - Texas owns the important resources like oil while California owns world's most succesful high-techlonogy companies. if we look forward hypothetical scenarios i think that's the way of thinking we should choose.

You are correct, but I never said everyone, I only ment to imply the culture in Texas breeds people more inclined to a combat situation then in california.

Bullshit.
More Texans may be willing to fight, but that still does not offset the sheer population of California and the amount of people they can throw.
I guarantee you some gangster from a Californian inner city can beat some redneck with his shotgun.

Also you're saying, FUCK STATISTICS< I"M RIGHT BECAUSE LIBERALS STINK!!

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:43

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:41

Написано от Rock Lee, 26.03.2017 at 23:37

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:28

What makes you think California has assault troopers xD they're to busy with the liberal arts degrees to give a shit about fighting. Texas on the other hand has large communities of people who sit around all day blasting shit.

Not everyone who lives in California turns incapable to fight.
-------------

Personally i think it's a stupid scenario since all the advanced and relevant techlonogy owned by american government and not to specific region, and if USA stays out of it so they will have to start everything from zero.

If we are being practical - Texas owns the important resources like oil while California owns world's most succesful high-techlonogy companies. if we look forward hypothetical scenarios i think that's the way of thinking we should choose.

You are correct, but I never said everyone, I only ment to imply the culture in Texas breeds people more inclined to a combat situation then in california.

Bullshit.
More Texans may be willing to fight, but that still does not offset the sheer population of California and the amount of people they can throw.
I guarantee you some gangster from a Californian inner city can beat some redneck with his shotgun.

You would never get that god hating american terrorist to fight for you but ok.

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:41

You are correct, but I never said everyone, I only ment to imply the culture in Texas breeds people more inclined to a combat situation then in california.

I think i know what are you talking about. these groups of guns fans who are sure that someone is going to take their libery and they must protect themselves found their way even to the news in Israel, but from short look you can see their incompetntence. i really would'nt count on those morons to carry team no matter how much they train.

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:45

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:43

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:41

Написано от Rock Lee, 26.03.2017 at 23:37

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:28

What makes you think California has assault troopers xD they're to busy with the liberal arts degrees to give a shit about fighting. Texas on the other hand has large communities of people who sit around all day blasting shit.

Not everyone who lives in California turns incapable to fight.
-------------

Personally i think it's a stupid scenario since all the advanced and relevant techlonogy owned by american government and not to specific region, and if USA stays out of it so they will have to start everything from zero.

If we are being practical - Texas owns the important resources like oil while California owns world's most succesful high-techlonogy companies. if we look forward hypothetical scenarios i think that's the way of thinking we should choose.

You are correct, but I never said everyone, I only ment to imply the culture in Texas breeds people more inclined to a combat situation then in california.

Bullshit.
More Texans may be willing to fight, but that still does not offset the sheer population of California and the amount of people they can throw.
I guarantee you some gangster from a Californian inner city can beat some redneck with his shotgun.

You would never get that god hating american terrorist to fight for you but ok.

Religion does not help you fight better in wars.

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:43

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:41

Написано от Rock Lee, 26.03.2017 at 23:37

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:28

What makes you think California has assault troopers xD they're to busy with the liberal arts degrees to give a shit about fighting. Texas on the other hand has large communities of people who sit around all day blasting shit.

Not everyone who lives in California turns incapable to fight.
-------------

Personally i think it's a stupid scenario since all the advanced and relevant techlonogy owned by american government and not to specific region, and if USA stays out of it so they will have to start everything from zero.

If we are being practical - Texas owns the important resources like oil while California owns world's most succesful high-techlonogy companies. if we look forward hypothetical scenarios i think that's the way of thinking we should choose.

You are correct, but I never said everyone, I only ment to imply the culture in Texas breeds people more inclined to a combat situation then in california.

Bullshit.
More Texans may be willing to fight, but that still does not offset the sheer population of California and the amount of people they can throw.
I guarantee you some gangster from a Californian inner city can beat some redneck with his shotgun.

Also you're saying, FUCK STATISTICS< I"M RIGHT BECAUSE LIBERALS STINK!!

No your statistics are correct I was wrong more, vets live in cali then in texas. As for navies they are useless as they are in separate oceans. All Texas would have to do is sit on the Atlantic side of panama.

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:43

Bullshit.
More Texans may be willing to fight, but that still does not offset the sheer population of California and the amount of people they can throw.
I guarantee you some gangster from a Californian inner city can beat some redneck with his shotgun.

Also you're saying, FUCK STATISTICS< I"M RIGHT BECAUSE LIBERALS STINK!!

omg did you watch 24 legacy? gangsters versus terrorist, like the wire jokes came alive.

Написано от Rock Lee, 26.03.2017 at 23:45

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:41

You are correct, but I never said everyone, I only ment to imply the culture in Texas breeds people more inclined to a combat situation then in california.

I think i know what are you talking about. these groups of guns fans who are sure that someone is going to take their libery and they must protect themselves found their way even to the news in Israel, but from short look you can see their incompetntence. i really would'nt count on those morons to carry team no matter how much they train.

I'll take gun advocates over green party any day.

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:47

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:43

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:41

Написано от Rock Lee, 26.03.2017 at 23:37

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:28

What makes you think California has assault troopers xD they're to busy with the liberal arts degrees to give a shit about fighting. Texas on the other hand has large communities of people who sit around all day blasting shit.

Not everyone who lives in California turns incapable to fight.
-------------

Personally i think it's a stupid scenario since all the advanced and relevant techlonogy owned by american government and not to specific region, and if USA stays out of it so they will have to start everything from zero.

If we are being practical - Texas owns the important resources like oil while California owns world's most succesful high-techlonogy companies. if we look forward hypothetical scenarios i think that's the way of thinking we should choose.

You are correct, but I never said everyone, I only ment to imply the culture in Texas breeds people more inclined to a combat situation then in california.

Bullshit.
More Texans may be willing to fight, but that still does not offset the sheer population of California and the amount of people they can throw.
I guarantee you some gangster from a Californian inner city can beat some redneck with his shotgun.

Also you're saying, FUCK STATISTICS< I"M RIGHT BECAUSE LIBERALS STINK!!

No your statistics are correct I was wrong more, vets live in cali then in texas. As for navies they are useless as they are in separate oceans. All Texas would have to do is sit on the Atlantic side of panama.

Yah they can sit there and be blockaded. Major port cities such as Houston would be shelled nonstop by ships.

Also you seem to think there are no guns in California. You'll be shocked to find that California has the 2nd highest number of gun owners in the entire nation. The percentage of gun owners is lower, but the net total is the second highest.

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:48

I'll take gun advocates over green party any day.

If war breaks these morons will abandon army after one week. living under command or in system is not obvious.

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:49

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:47

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:43

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:41

Написано от Rock Lee, 26.03.2017 at 23:37

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:28

What makes you think California has assault troopers xD they're to busy with the liberal arts degrees to give a shit about fighting. Texas on the other hand has large communities of people who sit around all day blasting shit.

Not everyone who lives in California turns incapable to fight.
-------------

Personally i think it's a stupid scenario since all the advanced and relevant techlonogy owned by american government and not to specific region, and if USA stays out of it so they will have to start everything from zero.

If we are being practical - Texas owns the important resources like oil while California owns world's most succesful high-techlonogy companies. if we look forward hypothetical scenarios i think that's the way of thinking we should choose.

You are correct, but I never said everyone, I only ment to imply the culture in Texas breeds people more inclined to a combat situation then in california.

Bullshit.
More Texans may be willing to fight, but that still does not offset the sheer population of California and the amount of people they can throw.
I guarantee you some gangster from a Californian inner city can beat some redneck with his shotgun.

Also you're saying, FUCK STATISTICS< I"M RIGHT BECAUSE LIBERALS STINK!!

No your statistics are correct I was wrong more, vets live in cali then in texas. As for navies they are useless as they are in separate oceans. All Texas would have to do is sit on the Atlantic side of panama.

Yah they can sit there and be blockaded.

Also you seem to think there are no guns in California. You'll be shocked to find that California has the 2nd highest number of gun owners in the entire nation. The percentage of gun owners is lower, but the net total is the second highest.

Now thats worth, arguing about, the new gun laws in California from November have dropped gun ownership to less then 7%.

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:51

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:49

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:47

Написано от Witch-Doctor, 26.03.2017 at 23:43

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:41

Написано от Rock Lee, 26.03.2017 at 23:37

Написано от Helly, 26.03.2017 at 23:28

What makes you think California has assault troopers xD they're to busy with the liberal arts degrees to give a shit about fighting. Texas on the other hand has large communities of people who sit around all day blasting shit.

Not everyone who lives in California turns incapable to fight.
-------------

Personally i think it's a stupid scenario since all the advanced and relevant techlonogy owned by american government and not to specific region, and if USA stays out of it so they will have to start everything from zero.

If we are being practical - Texas owns the important resources like oil while California owns world's most succesful high-techlonogy companies. if we look forward hypothetical scenarios i think that's the way of thinking we should choose.

You are correct, but I never said everyone, I only ment to imply the culture in Texas breeds people more inclined to a combat situation then in california.

Bullshit.
More Texans may be willing to fight, but that still does not offset the sheer population of California and the amount of people they can throw.
I guarantee you some gangster from a Californian inner city can beat some redneck with his shotgun.

Also you're saying, FUCK STATISTICS< I"M RIGHT BECAUSE LIBERALS STINK!!

No your statistics are correct I was wrong more, vets live in cali then in texas. As for navies they are useless as they are in separate oceans. All Texas would have to do is sit on the Atlantic side of panama.

Yah they can sit there and be blockaded.

Also you seem to think there are no guns in California. You'll be shocked to find that California has the 2nd highest number of gun owners in the entire nation. The percentage of gun owners is lower, but the net total is the second highest.

Now thats worth, arguing about, the new gun laws in California from November have dropped gun ownership to less then 7%.

Sources please. I've provided sources for my statement, now it's your turn.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2015/07/17/24-7-wall-st-oil-rich-states/30307203/

http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/10/news/economy/texas-big-economic-growth-2014/

http://www.cnbc.com/2012/07/10/The-Top-10-States-For-Technology.html

The war would be won by state on which territory it would be battled.
Guns and small rifles don't make big difference, things that matter are tanks, planes, rockets, etc.
Getting 1,000,000 of Kalashnikov rifles wouldn't be a problem for California, it would be even less of problem for Texas.
As far the ships go some could hit California or Texas from their base, because, modern technology.
Even if one state gets territory of another state, logistics would be huge problem

Lol wd, and I was thinking Vladracovita acts like a child with his hypotetical China vs Russia, who would win questions/ fight scenarios. Using comparison, we already have the example of the Civil War where the industrialised north won over cotton field farmers and barons of the south. Here it's similar, technologised north against the exploiting of natural resources like oil south. Technology will eventually win. But look at the number of veterans in texas, this state is a force to reckon with, it won't go down easily, but just think, in the future also cohabitation would be hard between these 2 neighbouring states with such an event in the past.

Cali wins cuz more industry... but industry is not a guaranteed win cuz look at vietnam war, revolutionary war etc....

Написано от Checkmate., 27.03.2017 at 09:57

Cali wins cuz more industry... but industry is not a guaranteed win cuz look at vietnam war, revolutionary war etc....

I don't think you realize how much industry Texas has.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2013/07/03/texas-v-california-the-real-facts-behind-the-lone-star-states-miracle/

Написано от Google, 27.03.2017 at 10:30

Написано от Checkmate., 27.03.2017 at 09:57

Cali wins cuz more industry... but industry is not a guaranteed win cuz look at vietnam war, revolutionary war etc....

I don't think you realize how much industry Texas has.

ikik it is a lot...maybe one of the highest in country.... but is it more than cali?

too lazy to research

Texas wins, more military bases in Texas which means more military equipment and vehicles

Написано от Checkmate., 27.03.2017 at 10:33

ikik it is a lot...maybe one of the highest in country.... but is it more than cali?

too lazy to research

It is different. California has tons of potential for oil for example, but they don't tap it.

Texas controls the Oil industry.
California controls Social life.

I would compare it to Athens and Sparta, even though a little exaggerated.

I live in Texas, and I know hundreds of hunters that have quite a steady hand, and even more people who are technological geniuses.

I know people from California, and most of them have more of a taste for art. The population of Texas would be ready to annex if the correct situation arises. Texas is like America in the 1935 as far as war mentality goes, California not so.