This is your hypocrisy #2

Bombing in pakistan park. 70 dead + 300more people injured. No threads from all you "humanitarians" yet

Actually, I agree with this. Same thing I posted when innocent people died of bombing in Turkey.

True fact is that Pakistan/Turkey are more far away from us (Europeans) than Belgium/France and they are regulated in different way than European countries.
Also, true fact is they are another culture, religion, type of people, but our hypocrisy has broken the limits.

You know everything is messed up when we came on that level to pick who we are going to empathize and who not. Especially if they are part of another religion (I am reffering to islam) and are being all generalised as bombers, plane downers, terrorists or radical idiots who came to ruin us. That argument came from someone who probably never met any normal muslim in their RL.
This is not a game, every innocent life lost by religious or any other extremism (read idiotism) worth same. We are living on this fucked up planet all together, independently of our skin colour, religious status, sexuality or life views.
Behaving like life of European innocent is more worth than Middle East innocent is pure narrow-mindedness before everything else.

I am saying that as a religious conservative who is against massive illegal immigration of muslims in Europe.
In modern world, muslims radicals are those who kill in the name of their God, who actually don't understand any single point of their own religion and faithful life, but don't forget that christians (who I am also) were killing in the name of same God to complete their total misconceptions of the religion's definition. It's bullshit. Notorious bullshit. And it should stop.

We should eradicate it and it can be eradicated only if we are all together radically against it, with same level of empathy and condemnation for EVERY innocent life lost because of above mentioned reasons. Hypocrisy as 'life of Belgium innocent means more to me because Pakistan is too far away' won't solve anything. Whatsmore, it will only produce more split ups what is actually good only for those mentals whose brain is enough fucked up to blown themselves in metros or squars in the name of revenge, including religious ones.

We know where are their roots, we know who started it, we know who continues it. It's on us to clear out that we have the same enemy who are doing same things in to European innocents and the Middle East ones.

The less of them the better...

Написано от Evic, 28.03.2016 at 18:44

The less of them the better...

where TF is the dislike button

I've actually been hearing quite a lot about the bombing in Pakistan
And I don't know how many times you're going to make threads like this because we give you the same rational explanation every time, Belgium is a stable and safe country, of course it's more news worthy that there's an attack there rather than in Pakistan which sees violence like this much more

Написано от Viruslegion, 28.03.2016 at 20:19

I've actually been hearing quite a lot about the bombing in Pakistan
And I don't know how many times you're going to make threads like this because we give you the same rational explanation every time, Belgium is a stable and safe country, of course it's more news worthy that there's an attack there rather than in Pakistan which sees violence like this much more

Well, youre an american, and just like all other americans you always have this idea that middle east countries have "violence much more than western countries". Just so you know, pakistan is a free country and violence exists everywhere even in usa . I hate when i see people in tv saying " well we should not care about such and such country because theres violence there" that shows how much of an ignorant you are . Do you really think that all non western countries have violence and "arent safe" ?
Besides who gives a shit about the violence rate? Were talking about lifes not violence rate between countries you dumb ignorant fuck

Написано от AlBoZzZ, 28.03.2016 at 20:43

Написано от Viruslegion, 28.03.2016 at 20:19

I've actually been hearing quite a lot about the bombing in Pakistan
And I don't know how many times you're going to make threads like this because we give you the same rational explanation every time, Belgium is a stable and safe country, of course it's more news worthy that there's an attack there rather than in Pakistan which sees violence like this much more

Well, youre an american, and just like all other americans you always have this idea that middle east countries have "violence much more than western countries". Just so you know, pakistan is a free country and violence exists everywhere even in usa . I hate when i see people in tv saying " well we should not care about such and such country because theres violence there" that shows how much of an ignorant you are . Do you really think that all non western countries have violence and "arent safe" ?

I hate to break it to you Corrambo, but you live in America too, sorry but your secret is out
I do have an idea that there's more violence in the Middle East than the West because it's true, you don't see groups like ISIS driving down the streets of Montreal, New York, or Chicago, but you do in Mosul and Raqqah
of course I don't think that all non western countries aren't safe, but I do think that some Middle Eastern countries are, and that just so happens to be true

Muslims killing Muslims is not a big deal. But Muslims killing Christians is a big deal.

Well Commando, I'm glad you have no problem pointing out yet another violent attack carried out in the name of your religion, this time on Pakistani children simply for being Christians. I saw no need to make a thread about this event because really we would need an entire subforum to cover all the terrorism around the world committed by Islamists, but yeah, keep pretending that the real issue at hand is Western hypocrisy and not radical Islam.

https://actualidad.rt.com/actualidad/203267-ataques-terroristas-no-lograrar-atencion-paris-bruselas

Oh look what do we have here...

I'll just traduce the title.

"It's not Europe: Five cruel attacks that didn't called out the attention like in Paris and Brussels".

LOts of people tend to forget about countries that don't have "their views" or their beliefs, if it has a connection with someone that can hurt them, they just don't care. THey have lost what ethically matters.. Other examples are such as movie actors dying, everybody goes crazy for them even though there are still people dying from the swine flu virus, ebola, car crashes, drug addiction. etc etc.... As long as it doesnt affect their day to day life people tend to forget about the rest and only think of themselves. The same goes to the news, they decide what goes and what doesnt.

Society and the goverment is just a prison to maintain us all under control.

-Don't trust the system- "Lonely Island"

Написано от Evic, 28.03.2016 at 18:44

The less of them the better...

You do not appreciate the inherent value of human lives. You cannot claim to have a moral standard higher than these people that of which you think, and I quote, "the less of them the better."

Написано от Viruslegion, 28.03.2016 at 20:19

And I don't know how many times you're going to make threads like this because we give you the same rational explanation every time, Belgium is a stable and safe country, of course it's more news worthy that there's an attack there rather than in Pakistan which sees violence like this much more

I actually agree with this. If it happens often, it's not newsworthy. It's already irritating enough that there are national news programs that dedicate screen-time to heartbreaking stories, cute animals, petty celebrity scandals, and other nonsense that isn't notable or newsworthy in the slightest. Now we have to pay attention every time there's another terrorist attack in a region that's ridden with terrorist attacks?

No thanks. Just let me know when there's a big terrorist attack in a country that haven't had one in the last couple years.

Написано от International, 29.03.2016 at 01:37

Написано от Evic, 28.03.2016 at 18:44

The less of them the better...

You do not appreciate the inherent value of human lives. You cannot claim to have a moral standard higher than these people that of which you think, and I quote, "the less of them the better."

Написано от Viruslegion, 28.03.2016 at 20:19

And I don't know how many times you're going to make threads like this because we give you the same rational explanation every time, Belgium is a stable and safe country, of course it's more news worthy that there's an attack there rather than in Pakistan which sees violence like this much more

I actually agree with this. If it happens often, it's not newsworthy. It's already irritating enough that there are national news programs that dedicate screen-time to heartbreaking stories, cute animals, petty celebrity scandals, and other nonsense that isn't notable or newsworthy in the slightest. Now we have to pay attention every time there's another terrorist attack in a region that's ridden with terrorist attacks?

No thanks. Just let me know when there's a big terrorist attack in a country that haven't had one in the last couple years.

I read this comment and I realized that, those of us who are against an american dog having more relevance than the death of many people due to terrorism are probably the same who believe (or are close to believe) that the medias should'be used to educate the population (kind of communism).

I cant understand how you and the others who support this type of behavior in the news can be so insensible about humans lives. Ironically you've spoke in your first comment about the inherent value of a human live, yet defend medias style focused on calling out the attention with any BS than make the people aware about what's going on in the rest of the world.

But maybe this debate is just as the "What color is this dress?" one. We all see and judge based on the glass from which we see the society, and theses type of beliefs are very hard to change (a lot more from an online community in a game).

I believe that if you truly believed in your words, you would start seeing the Earth more like a World and less like a bunch of privileged countries.

But I don't blame you or the rest. It is inherent from the human to be egoist.

I guess nothing can be done to change your(s) stance(s) of the matter.

Написано от clovis1122, 29.03.2016 at 07:30

I read this comment and I realised that, those of us who are against an american dog having more relevance than the death of many people due to terrorism are probably the same who believe (or are close to believing) that the medias should be used to educate the population (kind of communism).

It is precisely because I believe that it is the duty of journalism to inform the populace that I am opposed to the media making headlines of every little shocking incident that goes on around the world. People died from traffic accidents yesterday. Starvation is a severe problem in some countries. Countries with a plentiful supply of religious radicals will have more terrorism. These are statistics, not news. They're something that obviously happens often and will, for the foreseeable future, continue to happen often. They're not something that people should be informed about. They are, in fact, things that they should already know about. I certainly don't mind these things showing up on news programs, for the benefit of people who don't have a reasonably accurate worldview, but these should never be frontline news, unless there literally wasn't anything more surprising to report that day.

I expect the news to tell me what I cannot expect from statistics and from a generalised worldview, not keep ranting about some common event every time it happens.

Написано от clovis1122, 29.03.2016 at 07:54

Sure.... but if a dog dies in the U.S or Miley Cyrus wants to say hi it for sure deserves all the attention of the world.......

right?

If you have bothered to read my posts, you would have realised that my opposition to ridiculous animals or petty celebrity scandals making headlines was as deep-rooted as my opposition to repetitive normality making headlines.

Your apparent lack of understanding on that point betrays the fact that you, in fact, didn't bother to actually read my posts.

Since you didn't bother to actually read my first post on this thread, here: let me quote the relevant section from that post.

Написано от International, 29.03.2016 at 01:37

...It's already irritating enough that there are national news programs that dedicate screen-time to heartbreaking stories, cute animals, petty celebrity scandals, and other nonsense that isn't notable or newsworthy in the slightest...

Ok, my bad.

I agree with you (in that aspect).

Написано от AlBoZzZ, 28.03.2016 at 17:24

Bombing in pakistan park. 70 dead + 300more people injured. No threads from all you "humanitarians" yet

Exposure is everything, rich white people only seem to care about rich white countires, and it's reflected in the news media available to the rest of us in caucasian dominated countries, at least the USA, I'm sure you guys have more freedom of information in Europe.

Topic be like.

Have you heard of the Tenu Le Ke Jana? It's a great song.

Wait, you have no idea what it is, don't you? Nobody sings that song in your neighborhood. It ain't in the top hits. It ain't on TV-ads, T-shirts or sang by your little sister. But you are still a hypocrite for not giving a damn about it. You don't know anything about it until you've heard it from me.

Because of that. You're a jerk for not loving the song. *Turn down for what-*

Im happy that evil muslims are killing another evil muslims,muslims are evil,less muslims,the better world will be.

Написано от AlBoZzZ, 28.03.2016 at 17:24

Bombing in pakistan park. 70 dead + 300more people injured. No threads from all you "humanitarians" yet

good image! i like htat,but rimuv that blood,better set evil muslims on places of blood.

Написано от Oleg, 29.03.2016 at 10:53

Im happy that evil muslims are killing another evil muslims,muslims are evil,less muslims,the better world will be.

Oh, then imagine how nice this fucked up world would be without you.... at least this game

Написано от AlBoZzZ, 28.03.2016 at 17:24

Bombing in pakistan park. 70 dead + 300more people injured. No threads from all you "humanitarians" yet

are you just too stupid to realize,that you are a hipocrite?

Написано от AlBoZzZ, 28.03.2016 at 20:43

Well, youre an american, and just like all other americans you always have this idea that middle east countries have "violence much more than western countries". Just so you know, pakistan is a free country and violence exists everywhere even in usa . I hate when i see people in tv saying " well we should not care about such and such country because theres violence there" that shows how much of an ignorant you are . Do you really think that all non western countries have violence and "arent safe" ?
Besides who gives a shit about the violence rate? Were talking about lifes not violence rate between countries you dumb ignorant fuck

You are such a retarded low life, low iq, ignorant scumbag. You cant even comprehend a simple online dummy-news article, let alone process the information you got and form logical conclusions. But sadly its not only you, most of the fools agreeing with you or upvoting you, just like you are either completely oblivious of basic facts or unable of simple cognitive and thought process.

1. In the recent bombing in Pakistan, muslim extremists attacked a mostly christian family gathering. The victims were CHRISTIAN. The bombings got enough coverage, nearly not enough though, in my opinion, since GENOCIDE and religicide against christians by MUSLIM communities have been ongoing for the whole of the 20th century. Did you just woke up? Welcome to the real world.



-Pakistan, especially, arguably the most vile and horrible place to live on planet earth, went from having a 23% religious minority population in 1949 to 3% now. Cases of bombings, killings, rapes, forced conversions and forced marriages are abundant. Moreso, the Hindus, suffered the greatest hit on their population through two successive genocides, leaving them with a percentage somewhere around 1% now.
http://www.hudson.org/research/9781-cleansing-pakistan-of-minorities

Conclusion : Muslim Pakistan has been exterminating its minorities since its independence in 1947, it still continues to do so, yet SOMEHOW its Europe's and USA's fault for...not giving it enough coverage

Its obviously not ISLAM'S fault, racist bigot khal you dont care about poor innocent Pakistanis you only care for your Europe. Its not like these normal people are anything other than peace loving "average" muslims.

What a bunch of fucking oxygen wasting, devoluted humanoids you are. Heres your peacefull Pakistanis.


Sectarian violence, religious crime, domestic violence, child abuse, rape and gang rape, acid & chemical attacks, illegal village courts and trials,
honor killings, bonded slave labor and the sale of women and children, Illegal detentions and abuse of police powers, extra judicial killings,
disappearances of persons taken into custody by law enforcement agencies, and the list GOES ON.

Almost all of the victims are either women or children or part of a minority ( religious, racial, sexual) and almost all of the abuses are related to Islam and sharia law. Ten thousand protesters, gathered the other day to fight for nationwide sharia law. THE VERY BOMBINGS YOU POST ABOUT ARE A RESULT OF TENSION BETWEEN MUSLIMS AND MINORITIES AFTER THE PUBLIC CRY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SHARIA LAW. You have no idea what the fuck you are talking about, nor do any of these stupid fucks here with their fake, crocodile tears for the poor little Pakistanis who burned more than 2000 of their brides on a single year, threw acid in more than 1000 women and murder 12 women on average EVERY FUCKING DAY


.
Fuck off subhuman cunts.






http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/236860.pdf
http://tribune.com.pk/story/760420/the-plight-of-pakistans-sexually-abused-street-children/
https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2015/country-chapters/pakistan
http://www.equality-insaaf.org/hrpakistananalysis.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Pakistan

This game turns into a 4chan xD

WARNING: Overly long rant.
Pakistan has gone through a multitude of military coups and puppet governments under the military. It's government is unstable to the extreme. Quite a bit of terrorism is sponsored by its intelligence agency (ISI — The Pakistani CIA....just less competent, and more for promoting terror than stopping it.) The Mumbai Attacks in 2008 (nicknamed 26/11 by the media) were planned by ISI to provoke India into declaring war on Pakistan. This would have united all the jihadi and Mujahideen groups along with the infighting prone Pakistani Armed Forces against a common external enemy. Win 1 for Team Pakistan.
China would probably have been drawn in too against India, forcing India into a 2 front war it wasn't ready for, enabling Pakistan to force an armistice that (for once) would be in their favour and allowing them to annex the Indian State of Kashmir over which India and Pakistan have gone to war 3 out of 4 times. Win 2 for Pakistan.
Pakistan is generally accepted to have a low go-nuclear threshold meaning India won't risk massive engagements. Win 3 for Pakistan.
International pressure due to Pakistan brandishing nukes. Win 4 for Pakistan.
Compared to so much win, what's a few innocent citizens?
You'll call me biased, but if anyone's biased, it's Wikipedia and your own medias.

"Under US and UN pressure, Pakistan arrested a few members of Jamaat ud-Dawa and briefly put its founder under house arrest, but he was found to be free a few days later."

"An Indian report, summarising intelligence gained from India's interrogation of David Headley, was released in October 2010. It alleged that Pakistan's intelligence agency (ISI) had provided support for the attacks by providing funding for reconnaissance missions in Mumbai. The report included Headley's claim that Lashkar-e-Taiba's chief military commander, Zaki-ur-Rahman Lakhvi, had close ties to the ISI. He alleged that "every big action of LeT is done in close coordination with [the] ISI."

Attribution of Mumbai Attacks

In short? Pakistan is plagued with trouble. It's own agency responsible for keeping it safe, trains the very terrorists that attack it and other targets worldwide.
It is certainly sad that children died merely for their religion, but frankly no one has much sympathy for Pakistan because of its actions, and the frequency that it happens. Wrong? Yes. Immoral? Yes definitely. Does Pakistan deserve it? The government (as in the institutions that allow this stuff) does. It's citizens are mostly innocent.
Brussels is the capital of the European Union and thus gained much more coverage.
ISIS is a new global threat that has declared a Caliphate and is simultaneously fighting 10+ country forces at once (making any atWarrior proud) = coverage + media-gasms.
Pakistan based terror is so common that it's literally not worth more than a cursory headline on a ticker tape. The ceasefire between India and Pakistan is violated so many times (pretty much every month during times of good relations, and every day when things are bad) and both media's promptly blame the other country, say a few lines about the time it happened, who fired first (always the other), who died, show a picture, and then talk about how a politician slapped his assistant. It's become common place and the population is desensitized to it. Sad, but true. Brussels is, as said above (in this thread, not just by me), pretty much terror free. Something like this is a headlines grabber. Reporters love it. They get off on it. I'm not saying it's moral, I'm not saying it's right, but it's human nature.
Addressing another topic on this thread:
Are Americans hypocritical? Yes. They talk about Peace and democracy, yet have a bigger military budget than the other top 9 countries combined together — nearly 6 times bigger than the next country on the list: China, and have more carriers (supercarriers at that) than the whole world combined.
Trump says he's going to end ISIS. Good. But Bush said that about Al Qaeda, and all that happened was someone else stepped in.
Trump said he'll pull troops out of Korea and Japan. Unsure about this, but probably not. China and North Korea would have a field day.
Terror is going to exist even if all the countries out of the blue became one cohesive world government (never gonna happen in our lifetime).
So basically Americans are hypocrites. But do they provide a big stick for terrorist groups to stay more or less in line? Yes.
Am I saying stop fighting terror since it happens anyways? No. But the media should stop acting like Brussels citizens are better than Pakistani citizens just because Brussels is a more peaceful and well-liked country. Everyone is human.

Khal is my hero when he makes posts like the one above

I really hope for you that one day you will regret that period of your life